And yet again, TAM states so elegantly and concisely the thoughts muddled in my grey matter. Thank you sir!The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Sun Jun 12, 2022 8:45 pmI’ve had that conversion before with others. My take is this…
The 2A doesn’t say "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of militia members to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
What it says is, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Thus, you do not lose your RKBA simply because you are beyond the age of 45—which was 25 years ago for me personally. The 2A doesn’t say your RKBA is age dependent. It says it shall not be infringed.
Absent age-of-majority laws, theoretically you would have the right from birth. In a virtuous society, it is the minor child's parents who determine if and when the child is mature enough to begin to exercise their RKBA…not the state. In fact, the founders wrote emphatically about the role of virtue in self-governance and liberty:
https://sovereignnations.com/2019/04/12 ... e-freedom/
Both George Washington and John Adams stated unequivocally that our system of gov’t won’t work without a virtuous population. Why else do you think that the left is doing everything it can to eliminate virtuosity in our youth? The DNC can’t come right out and say that they reject our constitutional republic and seek to overthrow it. They would be tarred and feathered and ridden out of town on a rail. Instead, they go after capturing our children by deliberately attempting to disconnect them from virtuosity.
Nobody with a brain can argue the importance of this. How many of us were around firearms from a young age, with nary an issue? How did this not result in mass shootings and a plague of accidental homicides? It didn’t result in those things—at least not nearly to the extent that they do today—because we made the cardinal virtues a regular part of child-rearing and education. Today, instead of teaching the virtues, we teach our children to explore the teacher's personal sexual pathologies and to learn how to put on drag queen makeup. Instead of learning about American exceptionalism's basis in liberty, they learn about America's systemic racism and gender oppression. They learn about the "unfairness" of capitalism instead of the horrors of communism. They lear; that right and wrong are relative. And on and on and on.
The left is an existential threat to our nation's political health.
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Uvalde School shooting”
- Mon Jun 13, 2022 9:40 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Uvalde School shooting
- Replies: 385
- Views: 332244
Re: Uvalde School shooting
- Wed May 25, 2022 6:55 am
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Uvalde School shooting
- Replies: 385
- Views: 332244
Re: Uvalde School shooting
Assuming this is not a rhetorical question, yes, there are allowances for carry at schools. PC46.03a1a03Lightningrocks wrote: ↑Wed May 25, 2022 1:14 am Are there exceptions to Texas laws about carrying on school grounds that allow some teachers to carry concealed at school?
- Tue May 24, 2022 5:43 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Uvalde School shooting
- Replies: 385
- Views: 332244
Re: Uvalde School shooting
Not all teachers “refuse to be armed”.
Teachers don’t have the choice to be armed at school unless the administration allows it. I have run several area schools that allow, at least some, of their faculty and staff to carry through the DPS School Safety course. There are a number of schools in my area that allow faculty and staff to carry.