TexasCHLforum.com

psijac wrote:I attended an event the breakfast club catered. Their scrambled eggs were too wet.


And that is my only contribution to this thread

howdy wrote:

RHenriksen wrote:Not to mention that graffiti (vandalism) is hardly justification for deadly force, of threat of same.

I am not advocating this: This might be better in a different thread. Feel free to move it.

PC §9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible,
movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime; or


§ 28.03. CRIMINAL MISCHIEF. (a) A person commits an
offense if, without the effective consent of the owner:
(1) he intentionally or knowingly damages or destroys
the tangible property of the owner;
(2) he intentionally or knowingly tampers with the
tangible property of the owner and causes pecuniary loss or
substantial inconvenience to the owner or a third person; or
(3) he intentionally or knowingly makes markings,
including inscriptions, slogans, drawings, or paintings, on the
tangible property of the owner.

ghentry wrote:I just watched an interview with him online and he said that he supports the President but does not agree with him wanting to ban Assault Weapons.