No such thing as an illegally posted 30.06 sign.cprems wrote:I 100% AGREE.Jumping Frog wrote:If I would encounter a clearly non-compliant sign, I am ignoring it. The law is the law as far as I am concerned and the statute is not ambiguous.
Given so few CHL's are convicted of anything, combined with the whole concept of "concealed means concealed", I believe there are only a handful of known cases anyway. This is not enough of a problem to have garnered any kind og AG attention.
I understand what you are saying. I'm coming at this from a different angle. If Government property (State) cannot be posted and enforced - especially if it is illegally posted (under State law), wouldn't it be the same if the sign didn't meet the statutory requirements.
It will be interesting to see.
Search found 1 match
Return to “30.06 signs not in compliance with State law”
- Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:52 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: 30.06 signs not in compliance with State law
- Replies: 21
- Views: 2765