I can't speak for WB, but I was commenting on the second sentence which seemed to be more big picture related than the first sentence.steveincowtown wrote:IANAL, but I would tend to disagree that the law is meant to prevent you from carrying in your own home and enjoying adult beverages. 99.9% of the time I am carrying openly in my own home, so I wouldn't not even be carrying under the authority of my CHL.jmra wrote:WildBill wrote:It not a matter of trust, it's a matter of the law.android wrote:If I am at my house and I drink and get over 0.08, do I have to have a friend come and take away all my guns until I sober up the next morning?
The premise of the whole line of thought is ridiculous. If you can't be trusted to be responsible with a gun after a few drinks, then you probably shouldn't have one when you're sober either.
I don't care what you do in your home as long as it stays in your home and doesn't result in the injury or abuse of an innocent person.
The first sentence was too absurd to respond to.