that's why they specifically stated several times the presser was an opening statement for the public and Jenna Ellis specifically stated the evidence will be revealed in court.JDstar wrote: ↑Fri Nov 20, 2020 9:41 am I have been waiting for some shred of evidence to back up the claims, but it appears that "the kraken" remains more myth than reality.
“We invited Sidney Powell on the show. We would have given her the whole hour,” Carlson said. “But she never sent us any evidence, despite a lot of requests, polite requests. Not a page. When we kept pressing, she got angry and told us to stop contacting her.”
Carlson also noted: “She never demonstrated that a single actual vote was moved illegitimately by software from one candidate to another. Not one.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... p_homepage
They also finally did what should be done, made it clear to the public the media is lying to the public either by lies of omission via literal censorship in deliberately not reporting the facts, or outright lies of commission via falsehoods.
They called the media out and what did the media do in response?
answer: nothing. Sat there and whined about "they havn't shown any evidence" Which Ellis shot down again by telling them directly this was an opening statement and the evidence will be revealed in court where it should be done.
edit: Ellis just did what needed to be done, called out the media in front of the entire country as to how dishonest they are.
They couldn't answer her because it is the truth, now the media is on the defensive owing to her calling them out.
consequently they will not be able to take their usual offensive position via being able to sell a lie to the public as they have been for decades.
round 1 in the culture war aspect of this goes to the good guys. And that will go a long ways within public opinion which is also a part of this as well as for the future.
Trumps attorneys have also made direct statements about the fraud, not oblique statements with the usual qualifiers ' we believe' or ' it appears' or 'we think' .
Thing such as that which qualify a statement as a personal opinion rather than a direct statement of fact.
This is significant because while I am not an attorney, it is my understanding that if an attorney makes a false claim via a direct statement of fact, not only are they subject to being disbarred, they are subject to criminal charges for doing so.
Powell, Ellis, Guiliani , have all made repeated direct statements regarding fraud, none of them are fool enough to set themselves up for disbarment or worse via trying to sell a false direct statement.
For them to make direct statements of fact as they have means they are telling the truth and can prove it.
Carlson can whine all he wants because he didn't get the scoop on this, too damned bad.