Search found 1 match

by flintknapper
Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:41 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule
Replies: 278
Views: 136469

Re: Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
We can replace the words "incident to" with "necessary for" and you get a clearer picture.
Good catch. Even with your excellent suggestion....it makes me wonder if the word "necessary" might ultimately be challenged. I am sure there is a DA somewhere who wouldn't consider my back-up gun "necessary"....(or some other such nonsense).

Perhaps better to just leave at it "For".

(3) the lawful carrying of firearms or other dangerous weapons in a Federal facility FOR hunting or other lawful purposes

Return to “Post Office Law Suit to Repeal Carry Rule”