TexasCHLforum.com

03Lightningrocks wrote:I find this a complete contradiction. We all profess to believe in the right to keep and bear arms, and if the government says they want private parties to go through FFL's, you claim to have an issue with it, but then we turn right around and further restrict our right to keep and bear arms when it is totally unnecessary. Unbelievable...no need to try and justify it. I understand all the fear based reasoning. It is the EXACT same reasoning for libtards wanting to restrict private party sales. If I were a libtard, I would say, what the heck? Why should you care? You already act as if there is some inherent danger in selling firearms. It is one thing to want to see a DL for evidence of residency, but to act as if the RKBA should be recorded and documented in writing, is a whole different issue. The law simply requires we use some common sense and not sell to someone who we know is a felon. I really don't get why anyone who believes in the RKBA would add rules that serve no legal purpose other than to admit guns should all be registered and recorded. You have ZERO liability when selling a firearm to a private party as long as it cannot be proven that you knew the buyer was a felon.

It isn't exactly an honor to be allowed to purchase your handgun. There are many more out there for sale that don't feel it necessary to insult the buyer by acting as if they think he has to earn the right to buy a gun.