TexasCHLforum.com

Keith B wrote: Doesn't say she rear-ended him. Doesn't say she was in a rage (playing vehicle leap-frog can be non-rage). And I would be scared if I stopped and some guy starts beating on my car and tried to open the door to get at me.

In this case you have made your mind up she is guilty. You don't know any more about the event than anyone else on here, you just want to push your unfounded opinion. I am with all the others on here that say let the experts figure it out. Your speculation that she was the one at fault is just that, speculation, so it needs to be dropped until the Grand Jury hears the case or the prosecutor decides the evidence warrants not sending it to the GJ.

barstoolguru wrote:

Mike1951 wrote:

Kawabuggy wrote:Here's a scenario-the shooter ran into the shootee, and then refused to stop to exchange information. The shootee follows her until she finally turns into a gas station. As he approaches her window-she draws a gun and shoots him.

In the Fox video, the window is shattered but intact. There is no bullet hole visible in the shattered glass. Since the window was still fully closed, the shot must have occured through an open door.

"He was attempting to open (Scott's) car door while striking the driver's side window," said Thomas Gilliland, a Harris County sheriff's deputy.

she shot through the glass. It is tempered glass and if pounding on it would have broken it; it would have shattered totally (nothing left in the door) and if tinted it would have been pushed in from him pounding on it (tint holds the glass in place )

Kawabuggy wrote:Here's a scenario-the shooter ran into the shootee, and then refused to stop to exchange information. The shootee follows her until she finally turns into a gas station. As he approaches her window-she draws a gun and shoots him.