Does this mean that any private enterprise could require you to provide your DL, CHL, and a major credit card number be recorded before you are allowed entry? Okay, so no one would go. But if this business was temporarily operating on gov't owned property, then would that still be allowed? If there is no law (or understanding) protecting our private information, then there should be.srothstein wrote: So, how can they justify the 30.05 warning? Well, entry into a private event is always by some type of contract. In this case, part of the contract is that you provide them with certain information IF you are carrying a weapon by using a CHL (I wonder if they are copying down off duty cops info too). This may be the same under the law as requiring you to pay a fee for an entry ticket.
Always appreciate your input Steve.