I will put it this way, if it did come back I would not rant and rave about it and attend the class. If it came down to a negotiation point to get OC passed then I would not voice opposition although I may not like it. There is always give an take on such an issue even though we might not like certain aspects of it. We all know that most CHL holders do not stay up to date on the current laws, there are instructors still telling students of off limit places that have not been in effect for years. I feel that the members and frequent visitors to this site are the exception rather than the rule.....mojo84 wrote:Paragrouper wrote:I would agree. periodic refresher training is a good way to ensure the CHL population is made aware of any changes to the laws that may impact on how or where they carry. We are all responsible for our actions; training helps us all to better understand those responsibilities under the law.Salty1 wrote:I have spoken with many CHL holders who wish they did not remove the renewal training requirement. Unless every CHL holder stays on top of new legislation they have no idea of what changes have been made and the renewal classes provided this information. CHL instructors are looking for new ways to generate revenues since the removal of mandatory renewal training has gone away. The prices of CHL classes has dropped so those who own their own facilities and ranges need to replace that revenue stream. Personally I would have no issues if renewal training came back and I am not an instructor.
Are you saying the training should be required by law or are you saying we should all be responsible and obtain the training we determine we need individually.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now”
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 12:42 pm
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 42083
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Wed Mar 18, 2015 9:05 am
- Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
- Topic: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
- Replies: 276
- Views: 42083
Re: HB 910 (OC) Committee debate - Now
I have spoken with many CHL holders who wish they did not remove the renewal training requirement. Unless every CHL holder stays on top of new legislation they have no idea of what changes have been made and the renewal classes provided this information. CHL instructors are looking for new ways to generate revenues since the removal of mandatory renewal training has gone away. The prices of CHL classes has dropped so those who own their own facilities and ranges need to replace that revenue stream. Personally I would have no issues if renewal training came back and I am not an instructor.mr1337 wrote:This firearm instructor wants to bring back the class for renewals. His business must be hurting from when the requirement was removed.