I searched "firearms" in that Municode link,and they apparently moved their ordinance.
There's something listed in section 62-62 referring to definitions of "property",and section 62-64 reads like the sign posted above.
JL
Search found 3 matches
Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”
- Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:37 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 366716
- Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:31 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 366716
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Thanks Keith,I need to check into whether there is a court,etc in that building,but I don't think there is.
I'm not a smoker,and I knew that one about smoking was enforceable.
JL
I'm not a smoker,and I knew that one about smoking was enforceable.
JL
- Wed Apr 29, 2009 9:07 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 366716
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
How do City ordinances play into this? I recently had to go to City Hall and to the FIre Station in Port Arthur,and this sign is on both of those locations,as well as ALL other pieces of city property.
Is this a valid or legally enforceable sign?
JL
Is this a valid or legally enforceable sign?
JL