The Annoyed Man wrote:
The reasons I got one in the first place are two-fold: one is that you pick up reciprocity with OH, WV, & WA; and in the unlikely even that my CHL were temporarily suspended pending a shooting investigation, I would still (hopefully) be able to carry under the authority of the CFP. I figure that, God forbid, I should have to shoot someone, there would be some risk of retaliation on the part of the shootee's compadres, and that would be when I would least want to be disarmed. On the other hand, the Texas CHL gives you SC and KS, which you can't get with the non-resident CFP.
Isn't the issuance of a non-resident UT CFP based on the premise that you a hold a TX CHL? If so, wouldn't suspending the one invalidate the other until resolved?
If I were an LEO and I ran your plates and it came back with a Suspension, I would probably totally discount the UT CFP.
Just my thoughts on the subject.