Search found 5 matches
Return to “Shooting at Car Thieves”
- Sun Dec 30, 2018 4:15 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Shooting at Car Thieves
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18711
Re: Shooting at Car Thieves
I'm not going to guess one way or the other, especially on a public forum. I do know, he hasn't retracted a purposeful and negligent statement, (on a public forum) and that tells me all I need to know.
- Sat Dec 29, 2018 1:21 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Shooting at Car Thieves
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18711
Re: Shooting at Car Thieves
"They" say the average citizen is a felon three times a day.
- Fri Dec 28, 2018 10:31 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Shooting at Car Thieves
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18711
Re: Shooting at Car Thieves
Lil' Phoenix wrote: ↑Fri Dec 28, 2018 4:13 pmHave you stopped abusing the neighborhood children?baseballguy2001 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:55 pmAnd how many red lights did you run today because LEO's often run them?Lil' Phoenix wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:28 pmI often see police cars with the engine running and nobody inside.baseballguy2001 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:15 pm First off, the victim is a moron for leaving his car running and unattended. I'm not positive, but here, in Texas, I think that is against the law.
Texas Transportation Code - TRANSP § 545.404. Unattended Motor Vehicle
Sec. 545.404. UNATTENDED MOTOR VEHICLE. (a) Except as provided by Subsection (b), an operator may not leave a vehicle unattended without:
(1) stopping the engine;
(2) locking the ignition;
(3) removing the key from the ignition;
(4) setting the parking brake effectively; and
(5) if standing on a grade, turning the front wheels to the curb or side of the highway.
(b) The requirements of Subsections (a)(1), (2), and (3) do not apply to an operator who starts the engine of a vehicle by using a remote starter or other similar device that:
(1) remotely starts the vehicle's engine without placing the key in the ignition; and
(2) requires the key to be placed in the ignition or physically present in the vehicle before the vehicle can be operated.
Acts 1995, 74th Leg., ch. 165, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1995.
Amended by:
Acts 2015, 84th Leg., R.S., Ch. 1066 (H.B. 2194), Sec. 1, eff. June 19, 2015.
_____________________________________________________________________
Would you like to retract your purposeful and negligent statement?
- Wed Dec 26, 2018 11:55 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Shooting at Car Thieves
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18711
Re: Shooting at Car Thieves
And how many red lights did you run today because LEO's often run them? Leave your car running and unattended in a public parking lot next to an occupied police car and see if you get some "friendly advice", even if it's NOT against the law. Some things are perfectly legal, but they are still dumb things to do.Lil' Phoenix wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 1:28 pmI often see police cars with the engine running and nobody inside.baseballguy2001 wrote: ↑Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:15 pm First off, the victim is a moron for leaving his car running and unattended. I'm not positive, but here, in Texas, I think that is against the law.
- Wed Dec 26, 2018 12:15 pm
- Forum: Never Again!!
- Topic: Shooting at Car Thieves
- Replies: 46
- Views: 18711
Re: Shooting at Car Thieves
First off, the victim is a moron for leaving his car running and unattended. I'm not positive, but here, in Texas, I think that is against the law. Second, what happened to the "he was gonna run me down, and I feared for my life defense?" The cops that shoot at cars use that all the time, but not always successfully I admit. Also, when LEO's do shoot at a fleeing car, there isn't one thought of 'oh no, what if he missed' second guessing. Why? Because they generally have very tight groups and don't miss. The lesson is, practice Ladies and Gentleman. We all need it, and we don't get enough. Honestly, I think the car owner made a mistake. Would I put him in jail for it? Maybe not, but I would give him a very stiff fine.