TexasCHLforum.com

JP171 wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:

JP171 wrote:

pancho wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:This question really needs an answer. There are probably more than a few individuals willing to challenge the issue in court; however, there are probably no lawyers willing to take the case pro bono?

The problem is how the people willing to be a test case for non-compliant 30.06 signs can challenge it in court without also violating the failure to conceal law. Meanwhile I'll take my chances and obey the letter and spirit of the law with a clear conscience.

there is no longer a failure to conceal in texas law it is now intentional display so no such thing to violate

All of the LEO's know this, do they?

meh! I doubt it but then they don't know all of them anyway we have seen that here time and time again and as is said concealed is concealed. so why the smart aleck question OG?

JP171 wrote:

pancho wrote:

Oldgringo wrote:This question really needs an answer. There are probably more than a few individuals willing to challenge the issue in court; however, there are probably no lawyers willing to take the case pro bono?

The problem is how the people willing to be a test case for non-compliant 30.06 signs can challenge it in court without also violating the failure to conceal law. Meanwhile I'll take my chances and obey the letter and spirit of the law with a clear conscience.

there is no longer a failure to conceal in texas law it is now intentional display so no such thing to violate