. That said, please name one thing that is not about money - sooner or later.TDDude wrote:Its all about money.
If the city or state was serious about making traffic lights safer, the penalty for busting a light would be revocation of the violators drivers license with subsequent violations getting more severe. This business of a 75 dollar fine is a joke. I can't even take my family out to eat for 75 bucks.
I remember when a DUI was a hundred dollar fine and a slap on the wrist. Now it has very stiff penalties and ultimately becomes a felony. It can be argued that the DUI laws are about safety.
Search found 9 matches
Return to “Good news for people driving to Houston”
- Fri Nov 19, 2010 6:27 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:13 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
Thanks, but I'd rather walk.boba wrote:I'll remember that if you ever need a ride somewhere in an emergency.Oldgringo wrote:My old Daddy, rest his soul, always told me that you never loan a car, a gun or a wife. The post above would seem to bear that philosphy out.
- Wed Nov 17, 2010 4:02 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
My old Daddy, rest his soul, always told me that you never loan a car, a gun or a wife. The post above would seem to bear that philosphy out.TxKimberMan wrote:This is where I have an issue with this process (at least as I understand it). If I loan my car to a friend, and he is photographed running a red light, I get the ticket...not him. If a LEO would have issued the ticket, THE DRIVER would receive it. Just because I own the vehicle, doesn't mean I'm guilty of the charged offense.Purplehood wrote:The Photo. Like I previously mentioned, I got a ticket that was for another car. I fought it without leaving my house and won.Pawpaw wrote:To me, the problem with red light cameras is that the US Constitution assures you the right to face your accuser. With an automated camera, where is your accuser?
- Tue Nov 16, 2010 10:22 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
This is indeed a good plan. Cemeteries all across the country are populated with folk who had the right-of-way.CainA wrote:This is my habit too. Light turns green(for me) look both directions..pause a second..look again..all clear..proceed. Of course it won't stop the 100% of the accidents, but I would venture to guess that most lights that get run, get run within the first second or two of them turning red.Purplehood wrote:
Based only on what I have seen, and as opposed to what you have seen, I would dispute your assertion. I have seen entirely too many drivers simply blow through red lights in my lifetime. It has become a general habit of mine when I am the first car sitting at a light to hesitate before I go on a green light. I guarantee that it has saved my life more than once.
-Cain
- Tue Nov 16, 2010 8:52 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
It appears that there are those who think they are entitled to run red lights instead of plan a more timely departure to that big and important event ocurring at their intended destination.Purplehood wrote:I don't buy that and I don't buy the "Big Brother" concept. It is a public intersection and should be subject to public scrutiny. I don't really care what method is done to accomplish that. Police there 24/7, cameras, longer yellow lights, red lights all around...they are all sound ideas.Ameer wrote:Legality. The city charter of Houston prohibits traffic enforcement cameras operated by a for-profit company.Purplehood wrote:So what exactly is the difference between a camera recording a violation and a police officer, other than the fact that the police officer probably isn't watching 24/7?
This is not any invasion of my privacy. What privacy do I expect driving through a public intersection?
On the subject of the almighty dollar. Hey, anything and everything is about dollars. Even safety is not for free.
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:29 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
Sadly, money is the lowest common denominator for most all issues. There is a very interesting article in the recent October issue of Texas Monthly magazine on how to eliminate the $18MM budget shortfall.Charles L. Cotton wrote:We are going to have a State budget shortfall on the order if $18 billion, plus school funding will always be an issue. We should pass a bill that requires 100 % of all traffic fines to go to the State general fund. I know, I know, cities and counties will scream about the loss of revenue, but remember, they say they're not in the traffic enforcement business to generate money, but to save lives. So let them save lives while the State covers some of its shortfall.
Chas.
Ya'll reckon any of our governmental peole are interested in any of those suggestions or coming up with some of their own? Here's one for starters: how much does it cost the state to require front license plates?
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 5:08 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
Well! If that's correct, they shouldn't be doing it. Afterall, "illegal is illegal"...just like "concealed is concealed".Ameer wrote:Legality. The city charter of Houston prohibits traffic enforcement cameras operated by a for-profit company.Purplehood wrote:So what exactly is the difference between a camera recording a violation and a police officer, other than the fact that the police officer probably isn't watching 24/7?
Even so, running a red light is not an accident. Running a red light is an intentional act for which the runner should be held fully accountable; however IANAL, that's JMO.
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 4:01 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
Oh, I get it now. It's not about safety, it's free enterprise; i.e., traffic light monitoring, trash pickup, cemetery maintenance, etc. that is the objection.
Please honk if y'all plan on running red lights. You might also get your attorneys read into your scofflaw intentions also.
Please honk if y'all plan on running red lights. You might also get your attorneys read into your scofflaw intentions also.
- Mon Nov 15, 2010 2:50 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Good news for people driving to Houston
- Replies: 70
- Views: 6025
Re: Good news for people driving to Houston
Why? Running a red light is not only dangerously illegal, it's also rude.jordanmills wrote:Yeah, but some of the suburbs still have them. League City, for example. Don't forget to put pressure on your state reps to ban them statewide.