Wouldn’t the plaintiffs have to prove the shooter actually viewed the “immoral and unscrupulous” ads and thus was influenced? Probably not in CT, I would guess.dlh wrote: ↑Thu Aug 05, 2021 9:41 pm Here is another link to the story:
https://www.personaldefenseworld.com/20 ... andy-hook/
Notice the "man card" mention--this is totally ridiculous. The case barely survived the Connecticut Supreme Court (4/3 ruling allowing it to proceed). It is the kind of case our Supreme Court of Texas would toss in a heart-beat.
Search found 1 match
Return to “Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE”
- Thu Aug 05, 2021 10:09 pm
- Forum: The Crime Blotter
- Topic: Mass Shooting in Connecticut-THREAD NAME CHANGE
- Replies: 237
- Views: 56728