TexasCHLforum.com

Charles L. Cotton wrote:

AJSully421 wrote:

ScottDLS wrote:

gljjt wrote:What am I missing? Even if it is amusement park, since it is owned the City of Dallas, it is not off limits for carry. The sign is irrelevant.

If otherwise off limits under 46.03 or 46.035 city owned premises can post 30.06. Example: City owned Hospital.

Except for the fact that some places (hospitals, churches, amusement parks) were effectively removed from 46 by subsection (i) by saying that 30.06 is required to exclude them. This law compounds that by preventing a city from posting 30.06.

It is not circular logic, a city cannot post those noted in (i).

SB273 creates a fine for a governmental entity that posts an unenforceable 30.06 sign. TPC §30.06(e) states that 30.06 signs on governmental property are unenforceable unless that property is already off-limits under §§46.03 or 46.035. Amusement parks and hospitals are off-limits per §46.035(b)(5) & (6), respectfully.

Therefore, governments can post enforceable 30.06 signs on hospitals and amusement parks. There are no government churches.

Chas.

ScottDLS wrote:

gljjt wrote:What am I missing? Even if it is amusement park, since it is owned the City of Dallas, it is not off limits for carry. The sign is irrelevant.

If otherwise off limits under 46.03 or 46.035 city owned premises can post 30.06. Example: City owned Hospital.