Search found 2 matches

Return to “Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office”

by thejtrain
Thu Mar 27, 2008 11:28 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office
Replies: 37
Views: 5514

Re: Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office

Keith B wrote:
thejtrain wrote:The Feds can do whatever they want on their own property.
Yes, but they have to have a rule to back up their charge. 18 USC 930 only covers the building. There would have to be an additional code to cover the parking lot or have it posted (as Charles stated in a previous post.)
Right, I agree - I was just addressing the "I thought there had to be a posted 30.06 sign" comment, not the "is the parking lot part of 'property'" question, which other people far smarter than I have admirably addressed.

JT
by thejtrain
Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:38 am
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office
Replies: 37
Views: 5514

Re: Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office

Paco wrote:As I understood it when I took my class is that the 30.06 sign would have to be posted at the entrance to the parking lot, to have the parking lot/garage included in the restriction.

Personally I think the IRS just wants to be the most dangerous entity in the building and being strapped you may pose more power than them.
30.06 is part of Texas law, and it has no bearing at all on Federal property. The Feds can do whatever they want on their own property.

JT

Return to “Interesting Conversation at the IRS Office”