I need conclusive proof that this is happening. Please ask your mother if she will talk to me about this issue. Also, having the name of the insurance company and any correspondence, emails, etc. where she was told they credit union would be "rated" if no signs were posted will be quite valuable.Jago668 wrote:It is not always a manufactured excuse. My mother is president of a credit union. Their insurance rates were going to go up if they didn't put up signs. She knew she had people carrying in the credit union all the time, and she didn't care. Neither did the board. She knows if she just wanted to stop open carry she only needed a 30.07 sign, so it isn't ignorance. It is purely a financial decision. I don't know about every place, but I do know about one. She was going to get her chl until she found out she could carry in her car without it, and that was all she wanted to do. My stepdad carried everywhere he went, and I carry everywhere I go. So she isn't opposed to carrying.joe817 wrote:We had a topic going on back in February very similar to this one. About the reason for posting a 30.06/30.07 signs because of insurance company requirements. IMO that is a manufactured excuse to put the signs up. For clarification and reasons why that's just an excuse, see:
viewtopic.php?f=129&t=82800&hilit=insurance
To make a long story short......BULL!
This is something we can address, but as yet we have not a shred of evidence it's happening. I'm not saying your Mom is not telling the truth; I'm saying we don't have any proof.
Chas.