I know exactly who you are talking about and she's dead wrong. Unfortunately, it's not the first time. With all of the great improvements DPS has made, . . .gemini wrote:I agree. The logic seems sound. However, the female DPS atty over CHL does not agree. I went a few rounds with her last Fall over thisKeith B wrote:They had a 30.06 sign posted. And while a city owned building can't be posted, it is unclear if a private venue leasing the facility can post and enforce a 30.06 at the city owned facility.Bob in Big D wrote:I am guessing they don't have a 30.6 sign, so is it ok to assume that if you go to another event other than a gun show and security spots your concealed gun they will do what?????
My view in this case is if the facility staff were the ones that were performing the security, then they are city employees by virtue of the facility being a city owned building, so they can't enforce a 30.06. Now, i don't want to be the test case in court, but that would be my argument for defense.
very topic (State Fair, city owned facility etc). If you'd like a truly unique experience...... contact her and ask her to explain...... if you are able to get a word in edge-wise, and understand HER reasoning...... you're a better man than I.
Chas.