Wrong. Don't confuse "legal" with "defense to prosecution".txglock21 wrote:So after 3 pages of postings, my summary is: LEGAL= Yes/probably. GOOD IDEA= Probably not.
The law ALSO says:Sec. 9.02. JUSTIFICATION AS A DEFENSE. It is a defense to prosecution that the conduct in question is justified under this chapter.
So, y'all go ahead and shoot through that closed door.........and pray that none of your projectiles MISS the intended target which you can't see, and hit a neighbor. Even if you kill a bad guy, the round that missed and hit your neighbor removes your defense to prosecution in the wounding/killing of your neighbor. If I am your neighbor......and I survive the bullet......I'm going to end up owning your home and your bank account, and your future earnings for a long time.Sec. 9.05. RECKLESS INJURY OF INNOCENT THIRD PERSON. Even though an actor is justified under this chapter in threatening or using force or deadly force against another, if in doing so he also recklessly injures or kills an innocent third person, the justification afforded by this chapter is unavailable in a prosecution for the reckless injury or killing of the innocent third person.
Nothing is getting solved in this thread. Those that want to shoot through the door are going to, and those that don't think it is wise, won't. Enjoy the rest of this thread.