gljjt wrote:terryg wrote:mctowalot wrote:IIRC, the width of the baby Glock is "only" 25% greater than the Kahr. Or, the Kahr is 25% thinner, take your pick.
Sorry to go all geek on you. But the math for percents do not work that way. If the Glock is 25% wider than the Kahr - then the Kahr is 20% thinner than the Glock. Percent changes are not bidirectional.
Or if the Kahr is 25% thinner than the Glock, the Glock is 33% wider than the Kahr. Also depend on which way you "start"!
Are you calling the Glock "fat"?
