Does not mean anything unless you can PROVE it. The policeman does not have to prove anything to ask you a question. He may have to PROVE something to make it stand up in a court of law, but I still think it was a good stop.Search found 3 matches
Return to “School Zones & Cell Phones”
- Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:47 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: School Zones & Cell Phones
- Replies: 55
- Views: 8574
Re: School Zones & Cell Phones
Does not mean anything unless you can PROVE it. The policeman does not have to prove anything to ask you a question. He may have to PROVE something to make it stand up in a court of law, but I still think it was a good stop.- Wed Nov 02, 2011 7:34 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: School Zones & Cell Phones
- Replies: 55
- Views: 8574
Re: School Zones & Cell Phones
RoyGBiv wrote:The policeman THOUGHT.....Commander Cody wrote:I see nothing wrong with the stop. The police man thought you were texting, you told him you were not texting... done deal.
Not a very high bar you're setting...
A policeman can THINK whatever they want.... but they cannot act without PROOF.
It requires PROOF to exceed the burden set forth in the 4th Amendment.
It is NOT, IN ANY way OK for anyone to stop me while driving my car because they are unable to see both of my hands.
The day this becomes the law is the day America is lost forever.
OMG.! I'm becoming a Libertarian.!
- Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:40 pm
- Forum: LEO Contacts & Bloopers
- Topic: School Zones & Cell Phones
- Replies: 55
- Views: 8574
Re: School Zones & Cell Phones
I see nothing wrong with the stop. The police man thought you were texting, you told him you were not texting... done deal.