jordanmills wrote: ↑Mon Apr 08, 2019 5:46 pmIt's not a technicality. It's not meeting a clear and fairly objective standard for giving required notice that is a condition for a charge to apply.Jusme wrote: ↑Mon Apr 01, 2019 10:06 am Not unless you can prove you don't speak English.
Seriously though, if there is a big red 51% sign posted, it would behoove you not to be caught carrying. I have entered an establishment, and not seen any signs, until I was well inside the door, and they were posted above the bar area, of the restaurant. I promptly left. I then checked the TABC website, and found out that their signs were incorrect. They should have been posted with Blue TABC signs. I put in a complaint with the TABC.
YMMV but I would not rely on a technicality, like sign language, to try and "get by" with anything. Being arrested, charged with UCW, and having my LTC revoked, on the "hope" that the judge or jury, would see things my way, is too large, of a risk. There are too many other establishments to get what I want. JMHO
It's kind of like saying carrying with a LTC is a technicality because the 46.15 non-applicability has been ruled a Defense to Prosecution.
