Search found 4 matches

by ScottDLS
Thu Apr 16, 2015 8:52 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Deferred domestic
Replies: 33
Views: 4409

Re: Deferred domestic

C-dub wrote:
clarionite wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
clarionite wrote:
ScottDLS wrote: I'm 100% with you on this, We've got class c misdemeanants with lifetime federal firearms ban. The Federal "domestic violence" definition is very loose. I think that states could define it "out" of the federal prohibition, maybe.... And also know that there is no clear way to identify "DV" in the federal system. Especially problematic is the woman ('cause it's always a woman, right??) who copped to a class c or b before Sen Lautenberg's law, for :shock: shoving her husband. And the female that "slapped" her intimate partner for making a sexist remark... :shock:
I'm no more OK with a woman slapping a man than I am with a man slapping a woman. Neither are appropriate in my book.
do you consider such "slapping" a felony that should permanently ban a woman from owning a gun?
I don't see it any different than any other adult slapping another adult.

Why is it different?
The laws may be specific regarding a man slapping a woman, but I doubt it. The question at this point in this discussion is whether or not you think a slap deserves a permanent deferral.

and also what constitutes a permanent bar from firearm ownership. Speeding kills. I think we should have a vehicular violence law. Speed and you can never carry. My intimate partner has elbowed me when I made comment about xer gender identity. that is by definition DV. it has nothing to do with gender.... I am cis Female in transition....but anyway why is DV the special misdemeanor?
by ScottDLS
Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:39 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Deferred domestic
Replies: 33
Views: 4409

Re: Deferred domestic

clarionite wrote:
ScottDLS wrote: I'm 100% with you on this, We've got class c misdemeanants with lifetime federal firearms ban. The Federal "domestic violence" definition is very loose. I think that states could define it "out" of the federal prohibition, maybe.... And also know that there is no clear way to identify "DV" in the federal system. Especially problematic is the woman ('cause it's always a woman, right??) who copped to a class c or b before Sen Lautenberg's law, for :shock: shoving her husband. And the female that "slapped" her intimate partner for making a sexist remark... :shock:
I'm no more OK with a woman slapping a man than I am with a man slapping a woman. Neither are appropriate in my book.
do you consider such "slapping" a felony that should permanently ban a woman from owning a gun?
by ScottDLS
Thu Apr 16, 2015 12:02 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Deferred domestic
Replies: 33
Views: 4409

Re: Deferred domestic

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
C-dub wrote:
lfinsr wrote:I keep seeing this question over and over. I understand the law and it is what it is. Among us there is no one that hasn't done something stupid at some point in their life. Whether or not you were caught is the question.... :rules:

There really needs to be a way to fix this. A bad decision you made when young and dumb shouldn't haunt you the remainder of your life. At some point you've paid your dues. Am I the only one that believes this? I believe this is something the would benefit a great number of people that were in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Saying that we were all young and dumb and did stupid things is one thing and sounds cute, but we all have not done things to get us DQed from having a CHL. I wasn't caught because I didn't do anything disqualifying to get caught doing. Yeah, I did stupid things, but nothing illegal like that.
Pushing your spouse, girlfriend/boyfriend, son, daughter or any intimate partner can get you a misdemeanor family violence conviction. I understand what you mean, but we have to consider the changes to federal law and to some extent state law. I know a man who was convicted of family violence for pushing his drunk wife into a sitting position on the couch. Some people are now pushing to make verbal and/or emotional abuse a criminal offense. People better wake up and stop this very dangerous trend.

Chas.
I'm 100% with you on this, We've got class c misdemeanants with lifetime federal firearms ban. The Federal "domestic violence" definition is very loose. I think that states could define it "out" of the federal prohibition, maybe.... And also know that there is no clear way to identify "DV" in the federal system. Especially problematic is the woman ('cause it's always a woman, right??) who copped to a class c or b before Sen Lautenberg's law, for :shock: shoving her husband. And the female that "slapped" her intimate partner for making a sexist remark... :shock:
by ScottDLS
Tue Apr 14, 2015 3:37 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: Deferred domestic
Replies: 33
Views: 4409

Re: Deferred domestic

The real issue here is the loss of firearms rights for convicted misdemeanants... Only DV counts in this case where as all other misdemeanors don't. Thanks Pres. Clinton & Senator Lautenberg. If a DV is so minor that it is only a misdemeanor, then it shouldn't count. There are plenty of felonies to charge people with if they are doing more than shouting.

Return to “Deferred domestic”