Search found 2 matches

Return to “IKEA hell”

by ScottDLS
Mon Oct 20, 2014 8:24 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: IKEA hell
Replies: 36
Views: 9877

Re: IKEA heck

C-dub wrote:
ScottDLS wrote:
C-dub wrote:
TBJK wrote:Lol. Wouldn't seem to be legal but don't know if I'll test that one. It wouldn't seem to be an entrance if you enter the building then see it after you have already entered. Don't believe I will shop there anymore.
Keep in mind that a proper 30.06 sign does not have to be posted at an entrance. It's nice if it posted where it can be seen prior to entering, but it doesn't have to be.
However, if you don't see the sign because of where it's posted, you are (arguably) not in violation of 30.06 as you did not "receive" notice.
It is arguable, but it also has not been tested yet either.
Yes. Of course. And we wouldn't want to be the "test case" or "take the ride" or run into a "LEO having a bad day". Just remember "concealed means concealed" :rules: "rlol" "rlol" "rlol" "rlol"
by ScottDLS
Mon Oct 20, 2014 2:20 pm
Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
Topic: IKEA hell
Replies: 36
Views: 9877

Re: IKEA heck

C-dub wrote:
TBJK wrote:Lol. Wouldn't seem to be legal but don't know if I'll test that one. It wouldn't seem to be an entrance if you enter the building then see it after you have already entered. Don't believe I will shop there anymore.
Keep in mind that a proper 30.06 sign does not have to be posted at an entrance. It's nice if it posted where it can be seen prior to entering, but it doesn't have to be.
However, if you don't see the sign because of where it's posted, you are (arguably) not in violation of 30.06 as you did not "receive" notice.

Return to “IKEA hell”