Return to “NFA tax stamp and your local TX gun range?”
No data, only conclusions. I see.superstar wrote:What data? lol it's just logic.apostate wrote:I also disagree with the conclusion that OWB is inherently much faster than IWB, given comparable cover garments or lack thereof. However, I'm willing to look at the data with an open mind if you can share it.
You're right. I completely missed how a dress code equates to "pseudo-ATF governing powers" and, to be honest, I'm still missing the connection.superstar wrote:I think you missed the point above. Their requirements to carry IWB, no OWB. I think we can all agree that OWB is much faster to acquire the pistol than IWB. Wouldn't you want your employees to have that little edge over getting their pistol faster and be able to defend themselves?apostate wrote:superstar wrote:I would like to read about their pseudo-ATF governing powers.JustSomeOldGuy wrote:My curiosity compels me to ask what's the rationale behind this one? Cosmetic uniformity, like all employees wearing a company logo shirt?extremist wrote: Just like the requirement that we as employees have to carry IWB, no OWB carry.
James
Private sector employers are generally allowed to implement dress codes for their workplaces.
superstar wrote:I would like to read about their pseudo-ATF governing powers.JustSomeOldGuy wrote:My curiosity compels me to ask what's the rationale behind this one? Cosmetic uniformity, like all employees wearing a company logo shirt?extremist wrote: Just like the requirement that we as employees have to carry IWB, no OWB carry.
James