TexasCHLforum.com

misterholt wrote:If so, is it constitutional for a company to restrict the Rights of the people?

A company can fire you for saying bad things about the company, even if what you say is true.

I believe that hasn't been the normal weapons warning sign since some time in the previous century. I'm fairly certain the current sign mentions "unlicensed possession" specifically.

Lubttu wrote:I have been to 2 sporting events lately. One pro and one college. Both had posted the blue TABC sign. It is interesting because we are not allowed to carry at either place because of the sporting event and the college game is in a college building. Of course walking to myntruckmafter the games is when I feel I need it more.

The blue sign is irrelevant to CHL. Therefore, whether or not CHL can carry in a location (school, etc.) is irrelevant to the requirement to post the blue sign at a TABC licensed business at that location.

Looking at the text and the condition of the sign, I believe the most likely explanation is they did mean 30.05 because the sign is older than the 30.06 law. However, regardless of their intent, the sign does not meet the current requirements for 30.06 notice, and concealed handgun licensees have a defense to prosecution in 30.05, as shown in the quoted statutes.