Proposition #1. so what? should G.Gordan Liddy and Martha Stewart not be allowed to own guns because of their "crimes"? If criminals are so bad, then they should be in prison, not walking around.Beiruty wrote:Why regulations are needed?
Proposition #1: No restrictions what so ever ==>
1) Criminals and convicted felons will request the right to exercise their constitutional rights to own and carry.
2) Mentally institutionalized "actors" will claim the same right.
Proposition #2: No training what so ever ==>
1) CHL actor will shoot innocent civilian when he intent was to stop a threat at 10 yrds. Why this happened? No required training and said actor did have any training whatsoever.
Proposition #3: No refresh course for recently introduced laws.
2) CHL actor acted on his belief that last year and obsolete laws are still in effect. he committed an offense and he wanted to claim ignorance which is a no excuse in the view of the law.
I do not understand why people are against "common sense" regulations when said regulations do enhance the value of CHL.
I think if we have a right we need to protect the right and enhance the value of said right.
Proposition #2. Happens to the best trained folks. This would fall under the law of responsibility. One would held accountable for their actions.
Proposition #3. If there were no silly CHL laws, then there would be no need for training. Once again it would come down to one being held responsible for their actions.
