TexasCHLforum.com

Paladin wrote: ↑Sat Dec 12, 2020 9:38 am
But God Bless Texas, the other states who joined the lawsuit, Ken Paxton, Allen West and all those who sought a peaceful, lawful solution to this naked power grab.

Media outlets are saying SCOTUS rejected hearing Texas’ case, but the fact is that it was 18 states who were rejected.

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

Time to form a more perfect union.

https://nationalfile.com/texas-gop-chai ... rejection/
In a statement, Texas GOP Chair Allen West responded to the decision, and argued that in the tossing of the “constituionally legitimate and critical” lawsuit, SCOTUS has “decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law,” suggesting secession may be a solution:

“Resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences. This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the US constitution and not be held accountable. This decision will have far-reaching ramifications for the future of our constitutional republic. Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.”

Rafe wrote: ↑Fri Dec 11, 2020 6:36 pm Fox News just reported that SCOTUS has declined to hear the Texas election case. This deal now looks looks dead.

Not to say I told you so but......

And when this suit goes nowhere, when SCOTUS is shown to be corrupted and in the pockets of the communists, what do the aggrieved states do next?

And the title of this thread should be “Texas to the rescue of our Republic”