gregthehand wrote:I once again would like to mention that I saw how the "gunman" new exaclty where their opposition would be sitting. I mean it was very obvious to me that as soon as he shot the lecturer he turned exactly where they would be sitting. I even noticed at one point the student got up and moved the gunman's left. The guman had I guess practiced so much that they had to pause a moment and figure out where the person had gone. Also I noticed the gunman always focused only on the student with the firearm and never even looked at anyone else.
In my opinion the gunman had been told or trained (or both) where the student with the weapon would be seated.
How else were they supposed to guarantee the BG wins? A more honest experiment would be to run 10 scenarios where none of the victims are armed and 10 scenarios where 1-3 of the intended victims are randomly armed. No assigned seating. The 20 scenarios would be run in a random order, with the armed and disarmed mixed together. At the end we count up the number of BG "kills" when all victims are disarmed compared to the total BG "kills" when people shoot back.
Does anybody else hear the Wizard of Oz in their head when they see "If I only had a gun"
