I don’t know what law he is referring to, either, and I am a lawyer. I would strongly advise not taking legal advice from a CHL instructor unless that instructor is otherwise qualified to render legal advice on that particular issue. And, no, being a cop or ex cop does not qualify one to render legal advice. I can’t believe some of the phoney street law I’ve heard that starts with “my CHL instructor said...”LDP wrote: ↑Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:34 pm Lots of mistakes in this story.
But it ultimately comes down to the jury of our so called "peers" and how well the prosecutor can spin the race card, poor man card or plain "stealing isn't that bad" card.
Also, I rememeber that when I originally took my CHL class, the instructor mentioned some law that allows one to use deadly force to stop a thief from stealing property but only unrecoverable/untraceable property. If the stolen item could be traced back to you if found by the police, you may not use deadly force to stop the theft. He literally said "I can't shoot a thief for stealing my truck but I can shoot him for taking my hubcaps". I cannot quote the exact law, sorry. Hopefully someone has a handy link.
A CHL/LTC class is just a box the Legislature says you have to check to get an LTC in Texas. An LTC holder should never actually rely exclusively on what he learned at his CHL class.
There is an element of defense of property requiring you to prove that you reasonably believed that there was no other way to protect or recover the property. But many of these issues are not well defined. There are not many bright line rules in self defense law.