dlh wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 1:51 pm
The marketing rationale used by the Connecticut Supreme Court is laughably absurd.
Can I sue the spinning reel company when I do not catch a fish?
Can I sue the barbell company when I do not get the six-pack abs?
Can I sue the car company when I do not get the beautiful blonde?
And so on.
Hopefully the Supreme Court of the United States will hear the case and toss this frivolous litigation.
I think the more accurate relation would be, could a family sue Annheiser Busch, Jim Beam, or Jose Quervo because a family member was killed in a drunk driving crash. How about Ford, GM or BMW because they all create cars that travel fast enough to kill a person (speed is at least advertised).