TexasCHLforum.com

Oldgringo wrote:

mamabearCali wrote:
{snip}

It would be better IMO if TX and VA had carry laws like AZ or AK. Constitutional carry is very attractive to me. If you are legal to own you are legal to carry it however you wish. As far as being antagonistic and causing more 30.06 signs. I don't think we have anymore no gun signs than TX does. Truth be told I saw more 30.06 signs in my two weeks in San Antonio than I have seen in ten years in and around Richmond.

{snip}

There it is boys and girls, ladies and gentlemen. IOE, mamabearCali is spot on correct.

In our annual travels, we don't see any more "gun buster" signs in Oklahoma, Colorado, Wyoming, Idaho, Montana, New Mexico, the Dakotas and Arizona than we see 30.06 signs in Texas. Now then, what is the real problem? Maybe have statewide OC with metro preemption?

Charles L. Cotton wrote: Personally, I prefer the approach that has proven effective for decades and that's quietly getting support in the legislature during the off season, drafting a good bill, finding House and Senate sponsors who will not merely put their names on the bills but who will work their tails off to get it passed, and issuing Calls-To-Action if/when they are necessary. Sometimes the game has been won before it starts, so we don't rally the troops unnecessarily. I prefer this approach because it is what I know to work, it's what I've done since 1987, and I see no reason to change a procedure that has proven effective.

Chas.