Stretch marks?7075-T7 wrote:I don't think anyone has condoned venting frustration at the agents themselves. I think we all understand that it will not lead in a positive direction for both parties.VoiceofReason wrote:Nope, but I have had a few people talk their way into jail when I had intended to give them a break to begin with.
My point is that if you have a problem with the TSA screener, talk to his / her supervisor or write a letter to TSA, your congressman, the newspaper, God and everybody. Getting nasty with the screener will not change the policy but may cause you extra hassle.
But, when someone has to start disrobing for a possible hit on a stroller, it appears to be less about security and more about power. What are they going to discover that the 'enhanced' pat-downs wouldn't?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “PO'd Doesn't Begin to Describe It”
- Fri Sep 23, 2011 3:54 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: PO'd Doesn't Begin to Describe It
- Replies: 139
- Views: 14783
Re: PO'd Doesn't Begin to Describe It
- Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:18 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: PO'd Doesn't Begin to Describe It
- Replies: 139
- Views: 14783
Re: PO'd Doesn't Begin to Describe It
This. Warning: Though no gore or bad language, it is at least as disturbing as the mustang video.mamabearCali wrote:schufflerbot wrote:...and to those who feel that this is a 'security show' and not effective, is that honestly your opinion??
what would you rather see as a solution?
Sir, if a terrorist wanted to take a out a ton of people he would just detonate a bomb in the security line. If they were SO worried about the liquid why are they just throwing them in a trash can beside the security line. If they actually thought that a person had a bomb do you think that they would be handling it and manipulating a potentially explosive device with nothing but a dirty pair of gloves inbetween them and the device. That is how I KNOW this is security theater.
<SNIP>