Thanks! I will read it.74novaman wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 8:32 amYou need to read the Sage Dynamics white paper on red dot use.K-Texas wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:34 pm So how many of you guys carry, or plan to carry with a RDS mounted on your carry-gun?
The points made about putting the time in to get acclimated certainly seem valid, as far as range use. In a defensive shooting scenario, can you get a shot on target as quickly?
http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/7dc128_50 ... 7925b1.pdf
Related to your question would be the force on force testing they did.
In "defensive scenarios", the red dot equipped handgun was a significant advantage, even for students who did not have previous experience shooting red dot equipped handguns before this class.In a direct comparison, there is not a great discrepancy in the number of rounds fired, nor in the number of rounds that were hits, there is a large discrepancy that favors the MRDS in the number of critical hits. It’s also worth noting that the number of rounds missed is nearly twice as high with iron sights.
Search found 5 matches
Return to “RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys”
- Tue Feb 18, 2020 2:10 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26115
Re: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Sun Feb 16, 2020 12:43 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26115
Re: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
There can be situations where the only sighting option is to use the planes of the slide or revolver barrel. Not a good time to be waiting for a dot to get on target. That must also be part of the training regimen.txhighlander wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 6:07 pmK-Texas wrote: ↑Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:34 pm So how many of you guys carry, or plan to carry with a RDS mounted on your carry-gun?
The points made about putting the time in to get acclimated certainly seem valid, as far as range use. In a defensive shooting scenario, can you get a shot on target as quickly?
What little experience I have with RDS etc tells me my money is better spent on ammo and range time. I did put xs sights on my Shadow Systems and when I relax and just shoot it is much faster. My accuracy went down a little bit but the more I shoot the better it gets.
- Sat Feb 15, 2020 1:34 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26115
Re: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
So how many of you guys carry, or plan to carry with a RDS mounted on your carry-gun?
The points made about putting the time in to get acclimated certainly seem valid, as far as range use. In a defensive shooting scenario, can you get a shot on target as quickly?
The points made about putting the time in to get acclimated certainly seem valid, as far as range use. In a defensive shooting scenario, can you get a shot on target as quickly?
- Mon Feb 10, 2020 7:19 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26115
Re: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
I've been shooting a TP9sa since November of 15 and use it for testing handloads. I like the SFl also that is the same length as the SFx, but is the tactical model without the +2 mag extensions. If a sighting system comes along that would work for me, the SFx would be a must have.Tex1961 wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:42 pmYou won’t regret the SFX. one heck of a packageK-Texas wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:46 pmI haven't found one that works for me either. Takes too long to get the dot where it needs to be. Same with ARs, I much prefer a low magnification scope of 2X or less on the low end.Tex1961 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:05 pm I’m just shy of 60. Old to many of you and young to many others. Over the last year I went down the RMR path but have returned to regular iron sights. My issue isn’t my eyesight but hands that aren’t as strong or steady as they used to be. Seeing the red dot on the target jinking around makes me look like I have Parkinson’s, and throws off my concentration. The iron sights while now harder to see due to my older eyes keep my sight picture more stable on the target. A conundrum for sure, but that’s my personal issue with RMR’s. Truly frustrating as I really do like them.
Crimson Trace is starting to do some very innovative things. Maybe they or someone else will offer a sight where the dot is fixed where you then adjust it for POA out to 25 yards, even 15 would be fine. Then I'd have a valid reason to add the Canik TP9SFx!
- Mon Feb 10, 2020 3:46 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
- Replies: 50
- Views: 26115
Re: RDS v. Iron Sights: Not just for old blind guys
I haven't found one that works for me either. Takes too long to get the dot where it needs to be. Same with ARs, I much prefer a low magnification scope of 2X or less on the low end.Tex1961 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 05, 2020 10:05 pm I’m just shy of 60. Old to many of you and young to many others. Over the last year I went down the RMR path but have returned to regular iron sights. My issue isn’t my eyesight but hands that aren’t as strong or steady as they used to be. Seeing the red dot on the target jinking around makes me look like I have Parkinson’s, and throws off my concentration. The iron sights while now harder to see due to my older eyes keep my sight picture more stable on the target. A conundrum for sure, but that’s my personal issue with RMR’s. Truly frustrating as I really do like them.
Crimson Trace is starting to do some very innovative things. Maybe they or someone else will offer a sight where the dot is fixed where you then adjust it for POA out to 25 yards, even 15 would be fine. Then I'd have a valid reason to add the Canik TP9SFx!