Search found 10 matches

by Keith B
Mon Jan 14, 2013 4:51 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

Redneck_Buddha wrote:<rant>Probably already been covered here, but any stop that results in suspicion of DUI means that every word exchanged with the officer is evidence gathered, or attempting to be gathered. Once you realize this, one may be compelled to deny, deny, deny. If you are not intoxicated and you know a sobriety test would certainly clear you, you have had NOTHING to drink on that day. I hate advocating dishonestly, but DUI stops are a dishonest exercise designed to create more criminals and more revenue, and many people have this slapped on their records that are in no way deserving. </rant>
This is not good information. If an officer can smell alcohol on your breath, but you are SURE you can pass a FST, then tell them you had a beer (or two) and submit. they are going to make you take one anyway, including more than likely a brethalyzer. Lying to an officer will only cause them to suspicion you have something more to hide when they can tell you have been drinking.

ANd, BTW DUI in Texas is for minors, for adults it is DWI. There are different standrards for the level of intoxicaiton as well.
by Keith B
Sat Oct 13, 2012 1:17 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

tbrown wrote:
Keith B wrote:Easy enough to put it behind the seat if you are in a truck or in the trunk in a car. And using the term 'container' to include the six-pack cardboard is a stretch IMO. Besides, they sell single cans in convenience stores. If cops were really out looking to bust people for that, they would just sit outside a store and watch for people with 40oz'ers coming out the door and getting in their car.
Back on page 3, a member claiming to be a LEO said, "I personally have a conviction on an open container enhancement with a DWI with an open 30 pack with cans missing and no open cans in the car."

Now that you quote the law, I wonder if he was really a LEO.
I can confirm AFCop is a LEO. He is also on an AF base. You can also get convictions by individuals pleading guilty and not fighting it. Doesn't mean the law wasn't stretched.
by Keith B
Thu Oct 11, 2012 7:59 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

Heartland Patriot wrote:Well, let me unbury this thread. I went looking around on the internet for a definition of "open container" in the State of Texas, to see if it includes a 6-pack with one or two missing. Lo and behold, I come across the good old TexasCHLForum...I should have known. :lol:

Anyway, as some may know, I work down in Lake Charles right now and go home when I can for a few days here and there. Now is one of those times. I drink beer, but not like I used to when I was a younger man. I have a 6-pack in the fridge at the moment, and being a night-shift person, would like to have a beer in my own home out of that 6-pack. However, after reading this entire thread, I am now "paranoid" :???: that one of AFCOP's LEO counterparts might decide to stop me, for whatever reason, when I head back to Lake Charles with the remaining 5 or 4 beers out of that 6-pack, find them in a cooler inside my Access-cab Tacoma pickup truck, and because he interprets that statute similarly, but even more strictly than AFCOP, cite me for "open container" even though I do NOT drive under the influence. I have NEVER been arrested for anything, and have only ever even had one speeding ticket, outside Sherman in 1993. Yeah, I know its a pretty far-fetched scenario, but isn't that what we do on this forum? Try to figure things out BEFORE they happen, so we can be prepared for them?

I'm curious as to whether there was ever an AG opinion issued for this topic, BTW. Also, if I threw away the cardboard that the beers came in, and just had the UNOPENED 4 or 5 cans in the cooler, is THAT an "open container"? Besides, I'm not just thinking about me, here, but about countless folks who take beers with them in an ice chest/cooler on an outing such as a fishing trip. What if they only took 23 out of 24 cans? Or 11 out of 12? This could impact THOUSANDS of people in our state...think about it.
Here's the law
§ 49.031. Possession of Alcoholic Beverage in Motor Vehicle.

(a) In this section:

(1) "Open container" means a bottle, can, or other receptacle that contains any amount of alcoholic beverage and that is open, that has been opened, that has a broken seal, or the contents of which are partially removed.

(2) "Passenger area of a motor vehicle" means the area of a motor vehicle designed for the seating of the operator and passengers of the vehicle. The term does not include:

(A) a glove compartment or similar storage container that is locked;

(B) the trunk of a vehicle; or

(C) the area behind the last upright seat of the vehicle, if the vehicle does not have a trunk.
Easy enough to put it behind the seat if you are in a truck or in the trunk in a car. And using the term 'container' to include the six-pack cardboard is a stretch IMO. Besides, they sell single cans in convenience stores. If cops were really out looking to bust people for that, they would just sit outside a store and watch for people with 40oz'ers coming out the door and getting in their car.
by Keith B
Wed Mar 14, 2012 9:35 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

AFCop wrote:....if there is an opinion/case law that defines what an "other receptacle" is, I will honor that and I will come back here and commit to that to the several of you! :tiphat:
The exact phrase 'bottle, can, or other receptacle' is used in many different states alcohol related offense statutes. I believe it is a generic cover all bases statement and would constitute any glass, pitcher, keg, etc that contained a trace amount of alcohol.

Even though we had no open container law in Missouri where I was a LEO, and we were largely laissez-faire on the laws due to Anheuser-Bush being a LARGE 'influence' in the state (pun intended), the 'other receptacles' phrase was used in some other statutes like the food code, and it was literally a 'catch all' for any container. Had a friend who was a health inspector and he frequently wrote up restaurants for using an 'improper other receptacle' to store food in.

I had one incident where I had just gotten off work and arrived at home when I heard a car crash out in front of my house. I lived right on a curve in the street and people would periodically lose control and wreck. Anyway, I was still in uniform and when I got outside the passenger had just gotten out and was still holding a now broken partial pitcher of beer. He dropped it and ran out into the woods when he saw me heading across the street. Caught the driver, he had been drinking, but he was not intoxicated. Had we had a open container law, we could have gotten him on that. However, I did find a nice large bag of pot in the truck, so the open container and alcohol would have been the least of he and his friend's worries. :thumbs2:
by Keith B
Fri Feb 17, 2012 10:08 am
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

stash wrote:I don't know how true this is but I remember reading 10 or so years ago that a slice of bread contains more alcohol than a non-alcoholic beer. It could have been an advertisement for a non-alcoholic beer (don't remember) for all I know but I do remember reading it.
Well, it varies where you look. An article in the Canadian Medical Association Journal http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article ... 87/?page=1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; says there can be anywhere from .04% to 1.9% left in bread. However, I don't buy it in any modern bread that is properly baked.

To form alcohol you must ferment the yeast and sugar. When you make bread, you are VERY early in the fermentation process, and, while there is a small amount in the dough at that point, baking should remove the alcohol via evaporation.
by Keith B
Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:06 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

VoiceofReason wrote:Something else stood out to me.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses an open container in a passenger area of a motor vehicle that is located on a public highway, regardless of whether the vehicle is being operated or is stopped or parked. Possession by a person of one or more open containers in a single criminal episode is a single offense.

If the can was dry, (bone dry), seems to me he would have had a problem proving you knew it was behind the seat.
Could also get you in trouble if you like to collect aluminum cans for the ¢¢.
by Keith B
Wed Feb 15, 2012 2:18 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

:iagree: May be how your lawyer got the charges dropped.
by Keith B
Wed Feb 15, 2012 1:54 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

Beiruty wrote::biggrinjester: At one time, I had carried and an consumed non-Alcholic (0.0%) Malt drink in my Vehicle. The container, looks like a beer bottle. Would I get in trouble if sighted and pulled over by cop? Maybe I will be cited for wasting their time :woohoo :woohoo
I don't think those malt drinks contain alcohol, but the non-alcoholic beers actually do. O'Douls for instance is 0.4% compared to a light beer at approximately 4%, so you have a 10 to one ratio. In this case, if you drank 20 O'Douls in an hour you could potentially be intoxicated, but they would probably have to arrest you in the bathroom. :lol:
by Keith B
Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:37 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

CheckonChico wrote: Interesting point especially when you take into account what happened afterwards. He searched the truck and lo and behold...he found an empty beer can behind one of the seats. :banghead: long story short I got cited for open container and speeding . :oops: :oops: .......
Legally, per the statute you were in violation, wheter you had been drinking in the vehicle or not.
§ 49.031. Possession of Alcoholic Beverage in Motor Vehicle.

(a) In this section:

(1) "Open container" means a bottle, can, or other receptacle that contains any amount of alcoholic beverage and that is open, that has been opened, that has a broken seal, or the contents of which are partially removed.

(2) "Passenger area of a motor vehicle" means the area of a motor vehicle designed for the seating of the operator and passengers of the vehicle. The term does not include:

(A) a glove compartment or similar storage container that is locked;

(B) the trunk of a vehicle; or

(C) the area behind the last upright seat of the vehicle, if the vehicle does not have a trunk.

(3) "Public highway" means the entire width between and immediately adjacent to the boundary lines of any public road, street, highway, interstate, or other publicly maintained way if any part is open for public use for the purpose of motor vehicle travel. The term includes the right-of-way of a public highway.

(b) A person commits an offense if the person knowingly possesses an open container in a passenger area of a motor vehicle that is located on a public highway, regardless of whether the vehicle is being operated or is stopped or parked. Possession by a person of one or more open containers in a single criminal episode is a single offense.

(c) It is an exception to the application of Subsection (b) that at the time of the offense the defendant was a passenger in:

(1) the passenger area of a motor vehicle designed, maintained, or used primarily for the transportation of persons for compensation, including a bus, taxicab, or limousine; or

(2) the living quarters of a motorized house coach or motorized house trailer, including a self-contained camper, a motor home, or a recreational vehicle.

(d) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.

(e) A peace officer charging a person with an offense under this section, instead of taking the person before a magistrate, shall issue to the person a written citation and notice to appear that contains the time and place the person must appear before a magistrate, the name and address of the person charged, and the offense charged. If the person makes a written promise to appear before the magistrate by signing in duplicate the citation and notice to appear issued by the officer, the officer shall release the person.
As for probable cause, the smell of alcohol, as I stated earlier, is usually enough to justify probable cause for a search, especially in a no open container state like Texas.

Sounds like you got a good lawyer and he was able to get the charge it dismissed. And, Open Container is no biggie as long as you weren't charged with DWI.
by Keith B
Tue Feb 14, 2012 4:38 pm
Forum: Never Again!!
Topic: incident with Johnson County Sheriff
Replies: 138
Views: 24867

Re: incident with Johnson County Sheriff

I am not a Texas LEO or Lawyer, but in Missouri the smell of alcohol on your breath was probable cause for search, just as the smell of marijuana would be. I would assume it is the same here. And while you were not intoxicated, the smell of alcohol could indicate you had an open container in the vehicle, which is illegal in Texas. It could also indicate you were drinking while driving which would allow you to go on and become intoxicated as you drove.

Hopefully a Texas LEO will come along and validate my thoughts here in a bit.

Return to “incident with Johnson County Sheriff”