If you are 2 states to the east of us, then they require you to count like that before proceeding.bigred90gt wrote:Yes, this is true, but it is not really relevant to the discussion and I just figured it was common sense not to proceed when it was NOT safe to do so. I was just pointing out that there is no requirement to be stopped for any given period of time, only a requirement to come to a complete stop.Mel wrote:Actually I believe the rule is; You must come to a complete stop; AND THEN proceed only when it is safe to do so.bigred90gt wrote:There is no requirement to stop for any given time at a stop sign or light. The only requirement is to come to a complete stop.RicosRevenge wrote:RoyGBiv, I guess there is... I'll try the old touch football routine next time... ONE mississippi, TWO mississippi...
Seriously, only a complete stop is all that is technically required. We were taught in uniform traffic school that if the momentum of the vehicle had not settled (i.e. the body of the vehicle was still moving from a real fast stop), then a complete stop was not made. It is still a questionable thing.
In the OP's case, sounds like this officer was using this as his supposed probable cause to stop the vehicle, then go fishing.
Which bring up a question for the active LEO's on the forum. Do the dashcams these days record all the time or only when the emergency lights are turned on? I know they can be manually activated, but wondered if in general the supposed improper stop at the stop sign would have been on video if in the view of the dashcam?