TexasCHLforum.com

Amazingly, the guy was not fired. It is impossible to be fired at this place. Not even when a guy accidentally sent a amazingly graphic full nudity photo to the entire plant, admins, and executives. The only firing I know of is when 2 guys were "caught" in the plant. And personally, I think it was possibly the being gay thing that got them canned. This is the good ole boy kinda plant.

Russell wrote:The language is not identical to 30.06 and is, therefor, not technically valid.

His sign says "Trespass by holder of a license to carry a concealed handgun"

The language is supposed to be "trespass by holder of license to carry a concealed handgun".

I can attest that even a simple misspelling can get thrown out of court. A friend got out of a thousand dollar fine after the judge noticed her surname had an extra D that was not part of her name.

DoubleJ wrote:just curious, what's not compliant about the sign?
and just cause the sign's not at every entrance, doesn't mean the place isn't still posted.

Good question. He never said what was non-compliant. I think one must make a reasonable effort to ensure that any CHL can be notified that the plant is posted. 1/3 of our employees would never see this sign entering the admin building, and nothing related to the posting of a 30.06 sign has been communicated to employees (to my knowledge)

So some idiot employee pulled out a gun and was playfully showing it around in the plant. Now the plant enterance is posted. The security manager is a CHL, and states he made this one "non-compliant on purpose" after management forced him to post. Also, one can simply enter the plant through the admin building where I work and never see this sign.