TexasCHLforum.com

I have 24 years experience in property and casualty insurance and am still an active agent. No one within our agency has heard of any insurance company declining to accept a casualty risk simply because they don't post 30.06 or 30.07 signs. We don't write any credit unions, but write three large banks. The largest bank has no signage and the others have both signs. We have not heard of any pressure from insurance companies for signage in any manner including an increase in rates or reduction of coverage.

The link below is a fairly recent post from a credit union association that exists to advance the success of credit unions. The website states total membership is 550. The article's first sentence of the next to last paragraph is its summary "What this means for credit unions is that you can decide whether to permit or ban the possession of firearms, whether concealed or openly carried, on your property." No mention is made about pressure from insurance companies to post signage. If a CU official wanted to push their signage decision off on an insurance company, this would be good place to do it.

https://www.cornerstoneleague.coop/wher ... union.html

Don't mean to beat a dead horse as sometimes insurance companies "encourage" certain policies and procedures to lessen risks. I don't see any evidence of it from my side of the desk.