Search found 3 matches

by TreyHouston
Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:04 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Poll: Stop and Frisk
Replies: 63
Views: 10887

Re: Poll: Stop and Frisk

mr1337 wrote:
thatguyoverthere wrote:However, the LEO better have a REAL good, clearly defined reason to stop that person in the first place. That's where I get the heartburn.
Exactly. A detainment without reasonable suspicion is illegal. You can't detain someone just because they look like a thug. If you reasonably suspect they committed a crime, they can be detained and subsequently frisked for officer safety.

Unfortunately, that frisk is often more of a search because of the nature of the frisk itself.

To those asking how to get guns off the street without unconstitutional detainments (detaining without cause and frisking someone), I don't know the answer to that. But I do know one thing, I would rather be free than safe. Infringing on 4th Amendment rights is just as bad as infringing on 2nd Amendment rights. Cops need to work within the bounds of the law to enforce the law.

I think we once again have to wait for technology to catch up- metal detecting glasses or cops walking around with big magnets !!! HEY! I dont count anything out anymore!!! :evil2:
by TreyHouston
Wed Sep 28, 2016 5:57 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Poll: Stop and Frisk
Replies: 63
Views: 10887

Re: Poll: Stop and Frisk

...how do you get the guns our if the gangsters hands if not S&F? The cops know who they are and everyday the ones doing the crime have more and more rights?
by TreyHouston
Wed Sep 28, 2016 12:50 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Poll: Stop and Frisk
Replies: 63
Views: 10887

Re: Poll: Stop and Frisk

How abour rather than "stop and frisk" they come up with another way such as LONGER jail sentences for repeat gun offenders?
Honestly, my first thought about this was, "how to you get guns out of the hands of gangs"? Thats where the real problem is...

Return to “Poll: Stop and Frisk”