Search found 2 matches
Return to “RIP - Fines for Signs”
- Thu May 18, 2017 8:09 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: RIP - Fines for Signs
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14279
Re: RIP - Fines for Signs
We all know of many incidents where public property was posted. Does anyone know of one single fine that was levied? Just one?
- Fri Oct 21, 2016 8:18 pm
- Forum: Gun and/or Self-Defense Related Political Issues
- Topic: RIP - Fines for Signs
- Replies: 63
- Views: 14279
Re: RIP - Fines for Signs
I am glad you are optimistic sir. You have encouraged me as to the future. Now lets hope Washington leaves us alone.Charles L. Cotton wrote:I disagree on almost all points. The vast majority of unenforceable signs came down, not just a few as you claim. Yes, CP-108 is a problem, but only for locations were private persons or entities control government property. This is easily fixed as is the problem with so-called "educational institutions" and "amusement parks" on governmental property like zoos and libraries.
Rotor, you are correct about Sen. Estes. He's one of the strongest voices for Texas gun owners and a true champion of the Second Amendment. However, when a law need tweaking, you first go to the primary sponsor in the House or Senate, whichever version of the bill passed. This would be Sen. Donna Campbell (SB273), another strong voice for gun owners.
Fines-for-signs is not dead or even on its death bed. It has a minor cold that can be fixed.
Chas.