Search found 4 matches

by Soccerdad1995
Thu Mar 08, 2018 11:45 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Shake Down on the Bus
Replies: 21
Views: 3573

Re: Shake Down on the Bus

stash wrote:Am I correct in thinking, if you have 10K or less in your possession and have done nothing wrong are you good to go?
No, you are not correct in that thinking. Here is a little light reading for you.

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/08/12/taken

Most cases involve less than $10,000 in cash and seizures can include other assets. If your son sells $20 worth of drugs to a friend in his room, you can lose your house. If you violate a minor traffic law (driving in the left lane in the case of the above article), you get a choice of losing all your cash or having your kids taken away from you. Anyone who tells you that we don't need the second amendment is either corrupt or stupid.
by Soccerdad1995
Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:19 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Shake Down on the Bus
Replies: 21
Views: 3573

Re: Shake Down on the Bus

ScottDLS wrote:
Soccerdad1995 wrote:One of my hobbies in playing poker, and it is not uncommon for me to be carrying cash sums that might be considered "large" by some folks. As a precaution, I make sure I carry a recent bank withdrawal slip for an amount equal to or greater than the amount of cash, along with my latest W-2 just in case I need to "prove" where the cash came from. It is beyond sad that I need to do this in what once was a free country.

Fortunately, my income from my "regular" job is enough to easily justify the amount of cash I am carrying. Maybe we can just start getting permits from the government to let us carry cash and other assets......
I wonder what happens if you resist a "civil seizure". Since it isn't an arrest, what if it's strapped to you on a money belt? Are you obligated to cooperate with their detaching it from you. I have a sneaking suspicion that almost all the seizures are "incident to arrest" for a crime that suddenly disappears after they get the money. In this case, presumably the first mistake was consenting to the search. Another reason why one should never consent to a search without a warrant. Of course this is easy for me to say never having been asked to consent to a search of my person or vehicle, but its another reason on my list not to. :rules:
Consenting to a search is usually the first mistake in these cases. People naively believe that since they are not doing anything illegal, and "have nothing to hide" then they should go ahead and let the officer see that this is the case so they can go on their way. They don't understand that their cash and other assets can be seized based on the officers suspicion of an illegal source even if there is no evidence of them having committed a crime.

It can also be very difficult for most folks to refuse a search. The LEO is usually much better at convincing people to give consent than the average person is at refusing consent, and most folks can feel pretty darn intimidated until they say OK.

When I was much, much, younger I had a LEO skip the consent entirely. He stopped me, then asked me to step out of the car so he could show me that my tail light was out. After I closed the drivers door, he opened it back up and started poking around in my car. This was before dash cams, or body cams, and I was an ignorant teen ager. I don't think even the most brazen LEO would try to pull that now given the technology we have today.
by Soccerdad1995
Tue Mar 06, 2018 4:01 pm
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Shake Down on the Bus
Replies: 21
Views: 3573

Re: Shake Down on the Bus

One of my hobbies in playing poker, and it is not uncommon for me to be carrying cash sums that might be considered "large" by some folks. As a precaution, I make sure I carry a recent bank withdrawal slip for an amount equal to or greater than the amount of cash, along with my latest W-2 just in case I need to "prove" where the cash came from. It is beyond sad that I need to do this in what once was a free country.

Fortunately, my income from my "regular" job is enough to easily justify the amount of cash I am carrying. Maybe we can just start getting permits from the government to let us carry cash and other assets......
by Soccerdad1995
Tue Mar 06, 2018 10:57 am
Forum: Off-Topic
Topic: Shake Down on the Bus
Replies: 21
Views: 3573

Re: Shake Down on the Bus

It's called Civil Asset Forfeiture. The SCOTUS has found the practice to be constitutional. They were wrong, IMHO. Police can randomly take any and all of your possessions and you can fight them in court to try and get them back. You won't. At best you might get a settlement where you get some of your stuff back.

There are many, many stories just like this one from around the country. I personally know several people who have been victimized by LEO's in this way. And none of them had done anything illegal. None of them were even accused of doing anything illegal. Seizure of assets does not require that the victim be charged with any crime.

This is a prime reason why we need the second amendment.

Return to “Shake Down on the Bus”