This is what I was referring to.MotherBear wrote:I don't know, seems to me that if I pay for a specific class I'm entitled to receive what I paid for. If she was complaining that the course she signed up for was harder than advertised and she didn't like the GPA hit, someone call the waaah-mbulance. But if the material taught was not the material the department has set as the material for the course she enrolled in, and the standards she was held to were not the standards associated with that course, I think she has a case and should be compensated appropriately -- by which I mean she should be enrolled in the correct course at no additional cost, and the incorrect course should be removed from her records. She can then earn whatever grade she deserves on the course she paid to take.WildBill wrote:Maybe a little hint of "entitlement" ?G0C wrote:Speaking from the perspective of a hiring manager, I think the story reflects worse on the "straight A" student than the teacher.
Of course she should get class she paid for. My previous post about never hearing about tuition refunds is true - It may have happened, but I have never heard of a college giving a refund for a class that was taught. That doesn't mean that I think the students should pay for something they didn't receive. They would more likely give credit for the student to take another course.
need to take the same chemistry course as someone whose major is pre-med or chemical engineering.
