The exact same thing used to happen to me all the time. It hasn't happened once ... since I switched to Verizon.SlickTX wrote:OK, so here is how it went down. Here is the really scary part, after I called the police and they promptly showed up 45 minutes later the first thing they did was take away my phone, remove the SIM card and the battery and then the officer locked my phone, the SIM card and the battery in the trunk of my car. I'm like "whoa, dude, are you leaving me out here without the protection of my phone?" Well he didn't like that and proceeded to chew me out for, like, and hour or so.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “New rule suggestion”
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 5:27 pm
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: New rule suggestion
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5365
Re: New rule suggestion
- Mon Sep 27, 2010 10:41 am
- Forum: Site Announcements, Questions & Suggestions
- Topic: New rule suggestion
- Replies: 36
- Views: 5365
Re: New rule suggestion
I don't think a new rule is necessary or advisable. If forum members refrain from reponding to what they consider "outlandish extreme posts", then there is no payoff for the poster and they will disappear on their own.gigag04 wrote:In the same way that a new member cannot spam up a bunch of for sale threads without reaching a minimum post count..
I feel like there should be a minimum post count for recounting some outlandish extreme CHL scenario that solicits advise, or generally complains. This would be especially true for those that claim first person incidents...
Thoughts?