Unless they had been gone for days or weeks your dogs aren't gonna look starved and abused. That's the difference. Keep them and keep quite.narcissist wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 11:12 amGood point, I guess the moral part was thinking of my current two dogs if they ran off but im starting to realize we are doing the right thing.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 5:54 amThis, and it doesn’t seem to me like that much of a moral dilemma. It seems obvious they’re being abused, and they didn’t start out this way. One could make the "whose property is it" argument and satisfy the law .... if one were so inclined .... or one could make the "do right by the dog, and it will do right by you" argument. Doing the next right thing isn’t always the next easy thing. It seems like the first dog knows you’re a safe haven, and rescued his buddy. That kind of loyalty should be rewarded. Be the pack leader he deserves.Boxerrider wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 4:54 am I wouldn't get law enforcement involved either. I would consider taking pictures of them to document their condition, and maybe going back to the vet for a once-over. That will provide you third party documentation of their condition when they showed up at your place.
Search found 2 matches
- Fri Sep 20, 2019 11:57 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Moral Dilemma
- Replies: 28
- Views: 8751
Re: Moral Dilemma
- Fri Sep 20, 2019 3:38 am
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: Moral Dilemma
- Replies: 28
- Views: 8751
Re: Moral Dilemma
Keep them and don't say a word and leave the law out of it.