Search found 2 matches
- Tue Jun 11, 2013 6:35 am
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Optics opinions
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5630
Re: Optics opinions
1-4x optics are nice but get heavy when doing dynamic shooting/training. I still have a 1-3 on my patrol rifle but the weight really bugs me. It's a trade-off I make. The 1-4x would be good for your use, but why not get a 3x9 just to see where you find yourself dialing in the most? I find most recreational enjoy a bit stronger glass to shoot really tight groups at distance or hit a small lethal area on a pig. TAMs post is solid though if you go that route. He's probably procured more glass than I have.
- Sun Jun 09, 2013 10:04 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: Optics opinions
- Replies: 26
- Views: 5630
Re: Optics opinions
Range? Intended use?
Absent info I always recommend the Aimpoint micro. You can get an H-1 if you won't be running NODs.
IMO it offers the best possible value in terms of durability, weight, size, reticle options (2 or 4 MOA), cost, combat proven, and battery life.
Inside 200 a magnifier is nice but absolutely not needed.
I also recommend a taller mount that will get you a lower third cowitness for a cleaner sight picture.
Absent info I always recommend the Aimpoint micro. You can get an H-1 if you won't be running NODs.
IMO it offers the best possible value in terms of durability, weight, size, reticle options (2 or 4 MOA), cost, combat proven, and battery life.
Inside 200 a magnifier is nice but absolutely not needed.
I also recommend a taller mount that will get you a lower third cowitness for a cleaner sight picture.