If your providing a public service such as gas, water, electricity, what prevents a public utility from "censoring" somebody their service? What's the difference from a CEO from turning off your water for political reason from removing your web page from their server for political reasons?Charles L. Cotton wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 2:05 pmSomething needs to be done about YouTube censoring speech. Yes, it's a private company, but elected officials use it to communicate with the public and their constituents. There is a case prohibiting elected officials from banning posters from their Facebook accounts, when such accounts are used by elected officials for non-personal posting. I think that concept could be expanded to include all social media outlets used by elected officials. Otherwise, it will be quite easy to sway public opinion based upon who YouTube/Instagram/Facebook, etc. allow to post.The Annoyed Man wrote: ↑Fri Sep 20, 2019 12:12 pm MAC just posted on Patreon that YouTube just removed his "verified" status. He’s only got 975K subscribers...
C0CAB07C-22E4-4A66-906D-92D3D2E2A6F9.png
Chas.
Search found 1 match
Return to “ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY”
- Fri Feb 07, 2020 3:43 pm
- Forum: General Gun, Shooting & Equipment Discussion
- Topic: ARMED CITIZEN ARMORY
- Replies: 73
- Views: 29826