Pressure does not always require a threat. Some pressures are perceived, and sometimes it's because of power of position and who has the leverage. If an insurance company asks you to install signs, you may perceive that they are pressuring you because they have the authority to raise your rates or cancel your coverage. If it's not a priority for the business owner then it's much easier to comply rather than fight. We know that about 3% of the population is LTC, but of that 3% maybe half of them care about gun rights as much as most of the people on this board. Most business owners simply don't have enough passion behind gun rights to want to fight with the insurance company or even just go find a new insurance company.Mel wrote: So if they aren't threatening to raise rates, how else are they "pressuring"? Threatening to cancel? Seems to me that one must produce some kind of threat to "pressure".
It sure is great for us to have someone like Charles who is working and advocating on all of our behalf because it's the right thing to do and because there is a lot of misinformation out there. Most of it was likely started intentionally by people with a political agenda, and much has likely been spread by people who just simply don't know better.