Russell wrote: Currently the law is already you can shoot first and ask questions later anybody that is on your property without your permission at night time. I think that is sufficient.
No, it does not!
The section below that you highlighted does not include trespass. The law does not say anything either about "shooting first and asking questions later" You had better ask your self FIRST, "is deadly force
immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's
imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime?"
PC §9.42. DEADLY FORCE TO PROTECT PROPERTY. A person is
justified in using deadly force against another to protect land or tangible,
movable property:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.41; and
(2) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
force is immediately necessary:
(A) to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary,
robbery, aggravated robbery, theft during the nighttime, or criminal
mischief during the nighttime; or
(B) to prevent the other who is fleeing immediately after committing
burglary, robbery, aggravated robbery, or theft during the nighttime
from escaping with the property; and
(3) he reasonably believes that:
(A) the land or property cannot be protected or recovered by
any other means; or
(B) the use of force other than deadly force to protect or recover
the land or property would expose the actor or another to a substantial
risk of death or serious bodily injury.
Also, you may already use immediate deadly force if someone is breaking into your house. I don't understand what he means by saying you can't use deadly force against someone breaking into your home:
Again, only when you reasonably believe it is immediately necessary to prevent the imminent commission of burglary.
Those word; reasonable belief, immediately necessary, and imminent commission have are critical for you to have your defense.
The section quoted below does not cover you for a person burglarizing your home. The below section is defense of YOU. its just that there is no requirement to retreat if a person is using deadly force against you in your home
PC §9.32. DEADLY FORCE IN DEFENSE OF PERSON. (a) A person
is justified in using deadly force against another:
(1) if he would be justified in using force against the other under
Section 9.31;
(2) if a reasonable person in the actor's situation would not have
retreated; and
(3) when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly
force is immediately necessary:
(A) to protect himself against the other's use or attempted use
of unlawful deadly force; or
(B) to prevent the other's imminent commission of aggravated
kidnapping, murder, sexual assault, aggravated sexual assault,
robbery, or aggravated robbery.
(b) The requirement imposed by Subsection (a)(2) does not apply
to an actor who uses force against a person who is at the time of the
use of force committing an offense of unlawful entry in the habitation of
the actor
I suppose you could take away the "when and to the degree he reasonably believes the deadly force is immediately necessary," however if someone is crawling through my window or knocking down my door, it darn well is immediately necessary to give them a couple of rounds in the chest!
That's a dangerous, for you, predetermination to make.